Author: Maëlys McArdle

  • Review of “Parent File Scan”.

    Parent File Scan is a new tool in the P2P war that the MPAA released this week. It’s objective is to seek out and denominate all P2P clients as well as potentially-illegitimate copyrighted materials on a host computer, so that a parent may determine if their children are stealing things off of the whole interweb thing.

    I ran the software initially a few days ago, but upon performance problems decided to delay the test. A few days later, I was checking up my current list of processes, when I noticed that “parentfilescan.exe” was running. What was peculiar is that I had not started the application to begin with; it had simply decided to make itself run every time I started Windows. So I started up the application, wishing to disable this as it steals the resources of my computer when I need them most. The program did not give me the option of not allowing it to run. When I quit it again, it gave me a message informing me that it was now “exiting completely”. A blatant lie. So I went to look for the entries the program would of made in either msconfig or services.msc, the spots in Windows where programs declare that they are going to start with every run of the computer. Oddly enough, there was no entry for the applications. At this point, the program has more in common with Spyware than it does with any legitimate application. After all, it collects your personal information without your consent, lies about what it does, and does not give you the option of blocking it from running when you don’t want it to. This is my first major gripe with the program: it steals your resources, your information, and lies directly to you about it. The grade I give on my initial impressions: F.

    I find it ironic that the MPAA advocates protecting their rights by infringing those of others. But enough about the hypocracy of the whole situation: let’s see if the program actually finds any suspicious materials on my computer. I start up the scan… this takes a few minutes. When the program finishes, it comes up with the following screen and results:

    mpaasmall

    Well, it detected two installed P2P software: Azureus and WinMX. It missed both Kazaa Lite Resurrection and Shareazaa. This failure would normally be excusable if the missed software were unpopular, but that is most definitively not the case of such permeated titles as Kazaa LR and Shareazaa. So that puts my rating its abilities on P2P detection at a D-. Not good when that’s one of the main points that you tout of your software.

    As a tour de force, the program lets you uninstall the P2P applications. That’s like the MPAA coming to your home and offering to remove your VCR because even though it has alot of legitimate uses, some of it could potentially be infringing.

    mpaa2

    But what about all that copyright-infringing material its supposed to detect? Well the software does an admirable job in this respect: it doesn’t list potentially illegitimate materials per se, it simply list every frickin’ piece of media on your computer. As you can see by the first screenshot above, that includes the MP3s that are part of video games, that are used by productivity software for annoying bleeps here and there and so forth. Among all the media listed on your computer, some of it could be infringing… wow. A simple MP3 lister could of told me as much as that “Parent File Scan” software without all the privacy issues. Now the thing also lists any video files as well, including less popular container formats such as .ogm. As with the P2P software, the program lets you delete all the media files you choose. For doing the job of a media library software (listing all media) but somehow managing to screw both your system ressources and your privacy along the way, I give this software a final grade of F.

    This software was designed to inform parents of potentially infringing causes and materials on a computer. However, it really doesn’t live up to… anything. The simple fact of listing every MP3/AVI file on your computer does not give a parent an indication in any way if the material is infringing or not. Plus, even if the parent notices a tune by a pop band among the listed files, what’s to say that its not a rip of a CD the children own (which is not illegal despite what they want you to think), or released under the Creative Commons Liscence or some other legitimate cause. Alternatively, if a parent were simply to delete every media file on the computer, they would also delete parts of video games, productivity software, and even Windows itself causing serious issues.

    Parents concerned over P2P and copyrighted materials should avoid this program. Maybe just have an open and honest discussion with your children instead?

  • RIAA sues 717 file-swappers

    The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) said Thursday that it had filed 717 new lawsuits against alleged file-swappers, including 68 unnamed people at universities.

    The suits come several days after the record label group filed its arguments with the Supreme Court in a case examining the broader legal liability of file-swapping software companies. Movie studios also filed their own second round of lawsuits against individual computer users on Wednesday.

    Source: C|Net

    I believe that this latest news pushes the tally up to 8,423 lawsuits by the RIAA unto its consumers. I’ve posted my thoughts on this issue before. But I will note that the RIAA’s focus has shifted from announcing fresh new music to simply suing people, as evidenced by the the chosen selection of ‘latest news’ on their main website. Maybe it reflects a new financial model?

  • China. Getting better?

    By now I’m sure most of you have heard that the Chinese government [PRC] has banned 50 video game titles. What disturbed me wasn’t this fact, but rather that the article also stated that the same government “…will focus on combating illegal publications. This especially concerns pirated textbooks, electronic publications and illegal journals…”

    This is simply a pretext to go ban textbooks, for anything that’s brought from outside of the PRC’s jurisdiction is considered pirated materials. What do journals/textbooks have in common? They educate. They inform. They tell of things outside the figurative box in which one lives. Even if some aren’t always correct, the possibility still remains. The statement quoted above is a silent reminder that China is still very much a Commmunist nation intent on keeping its people in a limited (read: oppressed) situation.

    Tying with the above subject; today a Chinese double-gold medalist in Athens was kicked off the olympic team for being toopublicized. These tidbits are of the news this week. Now picture the situation being like so all year round.

    I’m detailing this because I’ve seen an increasing number of articles praising the progress of the People’s Republic of China with regards to world ties. Though China has opened up more market ties in recent years, the nation is still very much authotarian, and that is a fact that should not be so soon forgotten (*cough*).

  • Upside down patent system.

    Well its fair to say that the patent system is fairly upside-down. As is:
    1. Patents are getting to be general concepts, not actual designs.
    2. Patents are being handed out to groups who didn’t invent the darned things.
    3. Patents are issued, even though the idea already existed previously.

    Again, due to ignorance of the North American government, this is only happening in the computer industry. Such disregard for the basis of what patents represent (ie. rewarding those who invent things) is really going to screw over future innovation. This is the equivalent of allowing someone to patent the idea of “using flour for food” in today’s modern age. It fits the criterias after all: its a general concept, encompassing many other innovations such as “bread” and “cake”. It is issued to someone/group which has nothign to do with inventing it, and it is being issued even though the idea existed previously.

    Why do I bring this issue up? The US Patent Office just allowed McAfee to patent the underlying concepts of todays firewalls, as well as tracerouting. Both things McAfee did not originally invent. Both things that existed previously. And both things that areconcepts…. McAfee isn’t patenting code here, they’re patenting a general idea.

    This also means that McAfee is free to sue Norton, ZoneAlarm, Kerio, Sygate and all the other corporate entities that have developped firewalls over the years. The European Union is still in the process of negiotiating the permittance of Software Patents. Thanks to Poland, the laws have yet to pass on this issue (this is a good thing).

    I’m not against patenting software. Or at least patenting good sizeable chunks of code. What I am against is the current level of incredible abuse going on in the patent system. In its current North American form, such ignorant patent laws will only deter future innovation and screw us over as people in general.

    Read Full Article Here

  • The EYNTO Show

    The EYNTO Show (aka. the everything you need to know show) is my new pet project. It is going to be a one time one hour computer show informing the audience on the basics of the more advanced stuff they may engage in. Topics will include safer Internet browsing (browsers, vulnerability basics), Firewalls, Anti-Spyware stuff, P2Ps: which clients to avoid, basic computer upgrades (RAM, Optical drive), etc. Target audience: young adults.

    EYNTO

    I have no clue when it will be completed. I aim for a target of 4 weeks.