Author: Maëlys McArdle

  • Male privilege for trans women

    Male privilege for trans women

    I want to push back against the idea that trans women don’t experience male privilege. It’s not universal, but some do despite also simultaneously experiencing transphobia and transmisogyny.

    If a trans woman came out later in life in today’s climate, after she was already a software developer or in the top 10% income bracket ($80,000/year), then the statistical likelihood is that she benefited from male privilege to get to there. If during the majority of her life perceived herself to be a man and was gender conforming during that period, then she likely benefited from the thousands of microscopic benefits conferred by male privilege. These include reduced instances of sexual harassment on the streets and at work in the teenage years and beyond, having positive representation in movies and television, not having shitty magazines tell her to be thin, her toys being oriented towards building and leadership rather than home-making, not having her opinion devalued on the basis of her gender throughout her career, not having to experience punishing dress codes, not being asked about her raising children during interviews, and so forth.

    So even though she might now be experiencing transphobia, because she is still living off of an income surplus as a result of her male privilege earlier in life, she is still benefiting from male privilege even now.

    Cis women are under-represented in the top 10% income bracket. Source.
    Cis women are under-represented in software development. Source.

    The earlier in life a trans woman comes out, or is gender non-conforming, then the fewer benefits of male privilege she has received to the point of having had none. The same system of gender-based beliefs that elevates men in this society conversely punishes deviations to those norms harshly especially for trans women. That dynamic is called transmisogyny.

    If a trans woman came out as a teen in the past few decades, she would have felt unsafe in school. Her parents would have likely not been strongly supportive or at all. She might not feel safe to live at home. This creates a slew of punishing consequences, which can include experiencing homelessness and poverty. This then reduces the likelihood of being able to afford post-secondary education, which translates into lower income job prospects. The loss of opportunities during this period will carry with her for the rest of her life. She is more likely to experience mental illness as a result of how she was treated throughout these early years including for her perceived gender non-conformity. She wouldn’t be experiencing male privilege, but it’s inverse that pushes her down through a constant stream of negative interactions.

    If a trans girl came out during her childhood in a supportive family today, she also would not experience any male privilege. She would have led the life of any other girl.

    It’s not just about the age at which a trans woman came out but when. Coming out fifteen years ago might mean losing her job, her partner, and access to her children. The loss of income and opportunity she faced then, in addition to regular harassment in her daily life, would have halted any benefit of male privilege. Most of the older trans women I know today who came out in the decades ago live in poverty. Even if the world is now more accepting, the lack of income mobility in Canada means that economic realities set decades ago self-perpetuate into today.

    I want to pivot away from this idea that trans women don’t experience male privilege. Some do, some don’t. Part of what’s complicating things right now is that TERFs are using the experience of male privilege as a way to delegitimize women. They’re wrong. But so too is a knee jerk reaction denying that some trans women benefited from male privilege.

  • Conservatives are rewriting history instead of facing it

    June is Pride month, and both federal conservative leaders in Canada and the US have used this as an opportunity to claim support for LGBT/LGBTQ people.

    The spokesman for Conservative leader Andrew Scheer stated this week:

    “Canada’s Conservatives have a proud history of fighting for the rights and protection of all Canadians, including those in the LGBTQ community, at home and abroad. There are many ways to support these communities, and it is vital that the rights all Canadians are protected regardless of race, gender or sexual preference,” said Scheer spokesman Daniel Schow.

    Likewise, US President Trump’s official Twitter account had the following message this week:

    As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation. My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!

    Both assert they support these communities, yet their actions speak differently. For the Conservatives in Canada:

    Meanwhile, Trump has his own dismal record:

    • 2017: Removes guidance protecting trans students under Title IX.
    • 2017: Justice Department abandons its lawsuit against North Carolina’s anti-trans law.
    • 2017: Trump announces on Twitter he’ll ban all trans people from serving in the military.
    • 2017: Staff at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are instructed not to use the word “transgender”.
    • 2018: Department of Health and Human Service propose a rule to encourage medical providers to deny service on the grounds of religious freedom. This is coded language for denying service to women, gay, and trans individuals.
    • 2018: Bureau of Prisons roll back protections for trans inmates.
    • 2018: Department of Labor releases a new directive no longer requiring federal contractors to comply with nondiscrimination laws on the grounds of religious freedom. This is coded language for denying service to women, gay, and trans individuals.
    • 2019: Department of Health allows adoption and foster agencies in South Carolina to discriminate against LGBT caregivers.
    • 2019: Ban on trans service members goes into effect.
    • 2019: Trump announces opposition to Equality Act, which would add protections for LGBTQ Americans and others.
    • 2019: Department of Health and Human Services proposes a rule that would remove all recognition of all nondiscrimination laws intended to protect trans individuals.

    So what’s going on here? The hint can be found in the message on Trump’s official Twitter account focusing on abroad. The same is true of Scheer, with his spokesperson explaining:

    Schow pointed out more-recent examples of Scheer’s advocacy for members of the community. In June 2017 Scheer moved a motion in the House of Commons that, among other things, condemned the actions of Vladimir Putin’s Russian government against LGBTQ individuals.

    The Canadian and US government use human rights as a tool against countries that undermine their foreign policy objectives. This is why the Canadian and US governments vocally criticize Iran on the basis of human rights, but are quiet on more repressive Saudi Arabia. Since gay rights is fashionable, they’re using that. There’s a word for this: homonationalism.

    These conservative leaders do not recognize their role in encouraging prejudice in their home countries. For them discrimination is a thing of the distant past, or that happens in isolated incidents, or that occurs abroad, or in the case of transphobia – is seen as just. Scheer had an opportunity to confront his party’s opposition to these rights. It would have been a moment of humility and introspection, acknowledging how good people ended up advocating to hurt so many. Such a party would be less likely to advocate against the rights of minorities in the future.

    Scheer has chosen not to take these hard steps, and instead misrepresent recent history as one in which the Conservative party supported the rights of sexual and gender diverse people. Now he’s using the same individuals he publicly maligned for years as a tool to promote his foreign policy. An entirely expected, but nonetheless unfortunate, development.

    Addendum

    The day I wrote this article, Trump went on the airwaves and defended his purge of transgender service members with multiple falsehoods around drugs and surgeries. The next day, it surfaced that the Trump administration was prohibiting pride flag to fly on embassy flagpoles in a reversal of the previous administration’s policy:

    The denial to the U.S. Embassy in Berlin is particularly jarring because the ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, is spearheading an administration push to end the criminalization of homosexuality in roughly 70 countries that still outlaw it, as NBC News first reported in February. Grenell, the most senior openly gay person in Trump’s administration, has secured support for that campaign from both Trump and Vice President Mike Pence.

    The purported support of LGBT rights abroad is not genuine for neither Trump nor Scheer.

  • Where to from here.

    Where to from here.

    The last year has been eventful:

    I also leaned into my minimalism further. I more or less completed constructing my “before New Zealand” dream life in Ottawa.

    My life plans right now are to walk the Camino de Santiago in May 2020, to move to New Zealand in 2020/2021, and to then come back to Canada two years later to rejoin my chosen family and become a parent. Until then I want to save money, go camping a bunch, work on my mental health, and spend time with my besties.

  • First car

    I have achieved a life goal: getting a car.

    I got one for three reasons despite living downtown. The first is that for the last six months I have spent over 3 hours a day bussing to work. The commute by car meanwhile is 25 minutes each way. I want that time back. Second, I wanted to learn to drive standard for my worldwide travels and especially my move to New Zealand. Third, I wanted to go camping a bunch this summer and that’s just easier with my own vehicle.

    The car I got was a 2014 Ford Fiesta with a bunch of nice extras like fog lights and turn lights on the mirrors. It had 70,000 km on it and I paid $5,000. It was a very generous price by the seller, and I appreciate them for it.

    This is my first car, and though I took a few lessons, I had never driven manual before. In a trial by fire, a few hours after I got it I drove it, my bestie, and her two sibs to the Gatineau Park. I stalled it four times that day.

    I didn’t have license plates. I thought it would be more difficult to get through the bureaucracy of getting my first car, but it took three minutes at Service Ontario. The safety was done, I had proof of insurance, and the used vehicle package was filled out.

    I can now tick another box on my 2019 goals list.

  • Three months since surgery

    Three months since surgery

    It’s been three months since my vaginoplasty, and two months since laser eye surgery.

    Healing has been going well on both fronts. As far as my eyes go, I see better than I ever did with glasses in good lighting conditions. In poor lighting, when looking at bright objects such as crosswalk signs or screens, there is this visual effect accompanying these light sources that reminds me of what things look like when you have tear drops in your eyes. There was also a bloom effect around bright lights and this seems to have reduced significantly. It may take up to a year for my eyes to heal fully.

    With regards to my genitalia, I had a bit of a scare two weeks ago. I had discovered a growth in my surgical site. It looked like parts of my insides had fallen out of my body. After communicating with the overnight nurses at the recovery facility, it turns out it was hypergranulation. It’s a common complication. I went to see my doctor, and she necrotized the tissue. Over the next week it simply disintegrated with grey bits lining my underwear. Otherwise bleeding has ceased, and the surgical site has been healing quite nicely. I figure I’ll post photos at the six month mark. This too may take a year to recover fully.

    The follow-ups between laser eye surgery and bottom surgery have been starkly different. For laser eye there was an in-person follow up the next day, next week, next month, and now at the three month mark following the procedure. With bottom surgery, which was far more complex and expensive, I was on my own. Nothing ever came of the surgeon’s assurance he’d see me in a month following surgery. There was an automated email for two weeks, then nothing. I sent questions about bleeding that went unanswered. I heard nothing for three months. When the complication occurred, they did respond but asked questions for a different surgery than the one I had, then when I corrected them they gave me instructions to follow that were again for a different surgery. It reminded me of how bad communication in the lead up to surgery was.

    Neither surgery have been a source of much thought as of late beyond medical recovery. It all feels so normal. I adjusted to life without glasses immediately. I don’t miss constantly cleaning lenses, having my breath fog my sight, or minding the frames. As for having a vulva instead of a penis, that too was a quick adaptation. I don’t miss my penis, the sex, the spontaneous erections, the bump it made in my underwear or taking four diuretic pills a day. Having a vulva with a clit isn’t exciting, it just is. It reminds me of my breast growth during second puberty. It just was. Things might as well always have been this way.

    I’m glad I did these surgeries. They are a testament to how far I’ve come to be able to make these big steps in my life. With that, I conclude with my instagram stories during the course of my surgery and ensuing stay in rehab.