Blog

For the last few months, I’ve been hard at work with Docks. I’m trying, trying to get August as being the month where everything gets shot. Most likely, that’ll get extended into September. There’s a few hurdles that are left now, the main one being getting my hands on a decent boom mic. If I can get that settled, then I’m set.

I’ve also just ordered a bunch of shirts to be worn during by the staff of the fictional boat company in the film. With the launch of the film will also come the launch of some Docks paraphernalia, including the “official” company T-Shirts.

  

As some of you may know, I’m an avid fan of South Korean cinema. It churns out some of the best films this planet has to offer. You have action-packed films on par with Hollywood blockbusters (Tae Guk Gi), teen comedies (Attack the Gas Station), and the deeper kind of film that Hollywood could only wish to produce and others the budget to dream up.

However, I’m beginning to notice through these films the shallow perceptions that the Koreans place on the Americans. American films aren’t any better, of course. Even the more cultured American films have shallow divisions of culture – I’m thinking Clint’s latest Letters from Iwo Jima, in which the American soldiers do no wrong in the face of the rabid Japs. And let’s not even touch the whole generic “middle-eastern terrorist character.”

The Koreans aren’t much better. Welcome to Dongmakgol is one of the most popular films in recent Korean times. It’s a good movie, which centers on this small utopian village that is stumbled upon by a few North, South, and UN Korean forces. In it, you have a scene whereby a (weak) Korean tries to tell his (powerful) American commanders not to bomb innocent villages. The Americans are played out as ruthless characters that have no care for civilian life, while the Koreans are played out as the voice of the innocents.

It’s very black and white, with little historical context in between. Then comes the other film I’m watching this morning: The Host. This is again a great movie. But how does it start off? A (powerful) American and his (weak) Korean assistant. He orders the Korean assistant to dump raw toxic chemicals into the Han River. The Korean assistant, the voice of reason, objects. But much like Dongmakgol, the American overrides his objections.

You can tell the sentiment of a nation by it’s movies. It’s not hard to see how the South Koreans perceive the American continued presence over there.

Following my post last week, I decided to create a batch script that would let you see if your anti-virus product is also vulnerable to the “Vista Rootkit.”

You can download the script from here (Right-click, Choose “Save As.”)

Essentially, the script creates two identical files on your C:\ drive, in the C:\vistarootkit_test\ folder. These files contain contain a benign (read: non-viral) string of text that’s picked up by anti-virus products from all the leading companies. You can obtain more information on the test files here.

If the script works right, and your anti-virus product akin to mine, then it will pick up the “infected_file_detectable” (left image), but not the “infected_file_undetectable” (right image.)

What’s happening: Windows has a funky way of handling administrator accounts. Users, for instance, can chmod files to deny any other user read/write access to a set of files. What sets Windows apart from other operating systems in this regard is it’s adherence to these permissions for it’s root account equivalents – the Administrator/SYSTEM/etc. It is this fact which is being taken advantage of here.

By creating a dummy account, malware is able to run an instance of itself under that account, and deny read/write permissions to its files to all other accounts. This means that when home users run their anti-virus products, their AV will be denied read access to the malicious files. Meanwhile, the malware is able to continue to operate freely.

This demo script creates 2 identical files that should be picked up by any popular anti-virus product, and creates a new user account “viral_account.” It then sets the permissions for one of these files such that the viral_account has full access to it, but all other system accounts are denied access. When the anti-virus program is run, it should skip over the file whose permissions were edited, as it will be denied read access to the said file.

A simple way to rectify the issue would be for anti-virus products to modify the permissions of the files to grant itself access (Administrator accounts can do this – though they can’t read the file itself), screen it for known viral signatures, and then restore the file to the original permissions.

Report alleges Chinese Govt harvesting body organs of political prisoners

Australia has one of the lowest rates of organ donation in the developed world. The people who had kidney transplants in New South Wales last year, for example, had waited an average of eight years for a suitable organ.

That’s the kind of pressure that’s created the new phenomenon of “transplant tourism”, with patients going to countries like India and China for their operations.

Last year an Australian report highlighted the rate of HIV/AIDS or Hepatitis in patients who’d had such operations overseas.

Now a report from Canada says most of the organs in China are not donated at all. They’re taken from political prisoners who die after the organs are literally harvested from them.

Transplant doctors in Australia are alarmed and are calling for more Government controls on patients travelling to China.

Michael Edwards has this report.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id…
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2006/s1683142.htm
http://www.youtube.com/v/0wtSV_BEf14

Why has this received so little coverage? Is it because we don’t care? Is it because our own fear of dying trumps any kind of moral obligations? The original plan was that China was to be absorbed into global conventions with it’s economic rise. Now it looks like it’s rather the contrary: their economic strength is such that they risk no such thing, and we are the ones who cannot afford to speak out for fear of retribution.

We allow our citizens to murder political prisoners for only £50,000 a shot. It seems like though as much as we value our freedom, we allow ourselves to be used as tools to diminish those of others, under the pretext of economic strengthening. We admonish Yahoo for the slightest bit of privacy invasion in the US, but if they give up the IP address of a Chinese Blogger to the government – it’s good business. It’s all about business. We live in a world so economically competitive that we would rather shut up and allow atrocities to take place, rather risk hurting the economy. That’s part of the reason for which we are supporting the oppressive regime known as Saudi Arabia, isn’t it? We’d rather have their oil, and some of their territory for military purposes, rather than confront them about the beheadings of political prisoners?

So what does that make freedom. A worthless buzzword, a piece of economic garbage. If we allow our morals to be so pliable for the sake of economic power, then it is meaningless, and in danger of extinction altogether.

Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.
~Abraham Lincoln