Blog

  • Australia Outlaws GTA

    Australia outlaws ‘Grand Theft Auto’

    Associated Press

    SYDNEY, Australia – Australian officials effectively banned the computer game “Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas” and ordered it removed from stores Friday because it contains hidden sex scenes that can be viewed with a special Internet download.

    The Office of Film and Literature Classification said in a statement it had outlawed sales of the game by stripping it of its official classification after learning of the explicit content.

    “Revocation of a classification means the computer game cannot be legally sold, hired, advertised or exhibited in Australia from the date the decision is made,” the statement said.

    “Businesses that sell or hire computer games should remove existing stocks of this game from their shelves immediately,” said Des Clark, director of the government-funded classification board.

    The game involves a main character seeking bloody vengeance on gang-filled streets, firing automatic weapons and picking up women along the way.

    After downloading and installing a modification to the game – one of many “mods” available on Web sites maintained by video game enthusiasts – a new world opens up in which the girlfriends appear nude and engage in explicit sex acts, according to the modification’s author.

    The classification board in October 2004 gave the game a MA15+ rating, meaning it could be sold only to people aged over age 15, and warned that it contained “medium level animated violence, medium level coarse language.”

    On Friday, Clark advised parents to be on the alert for their children accessing the explicit scenes.

    “Parents are strongly advised to exercise caution in allowing children continued access to the game,” he said – particularly if they have access to the Internet modification.

    Two things wrong with this:
    1. Does this mean that every R rated movie ought to be banned as well, because it contains some semblance of sex somewhere.
    2. That last line… the word “children”… Why is it that the gaming industry is the only one that rates content from the perspective of children? This is an “M” rated game – it should never be in the hands of children to begin with. Just like an “R” rated movie never ought to be in the hands of children. To treat it as if it were in the possession of children is ridiculous.

    Furthermore, and I shall never understand this: decapitating someone with a chainsaw is considered worse than sex? Oh dear. Finally: this content is not accessible in-game. If they ban GTA, they might as well ban all video games and movies out there, as one can always find a way to insert content that would turn otherwise innocent content (The Sims, Teletubbies) into some kind of sex orgy.

  • Firefox vs. Internet Explorer

    For web designers dabbing in CSS, an interesting challenge is to make the webpage look the same in all web browsing platforms. The most interesting conundrum of which is dealing with how Internet Explorer deals with displaying CSS; which tends to differ from the norm. Take the following website for instance:

    The first screenshot is the page in Firefox. The second is with Internet Explorer. Fun times.

  • WOHOOO!!!!!!!

    This blog is entitled “My inane life… in glorious details”, and bear with me as I make full use of the “inane” bit.

    I am going into my third year of university, as a student of physical geography. Because my program is under the science faculty, my first year consisted of required “threshold science classes”, including Calculus, Chemistry, and Physics. These were all subjects that I faired rather poorly in High School.

    My first year of university was no different – I passed both Chemistry classes by the skin of my teeth. I failed Calculus … twice. And despite my passing the first physics course, I failed the second one … twice. Needless to say, my average was the pits. Nevertheless, I succeeded very well in my Geography/Geology courses.

    Then came first semester of year 2. If I failed math again, I would be kicked out of the faculty. I passed. With a B. And I passed everyother class with an equally good average [hey B is great for me!]. Physics had to wait for the 2nd semester though, as it was not offered the first time round. Second semester came. I passed the second math class with a B; and all my other grades were just as high. And hey: I even got an A!

    All except for Physics. I had failed it a second time. But there was hope: I could take a supplemental exam, as I had garnered an “E” grade as opposed to “F” like the previous times. I dreaded this new exam. I had studied like crazy the month before the initial exam, written 20 pages of notes, bought a solutions manual, did all the problems I could see. But I still failed. So now there was this 2nd exam coming along, and I was worried.

    I bought another physics textbook. It was cheap, coming in at under $30 CDN and contained hundreds of problems/solutions. “Schaum’s Outline to Physics for Science and Engineering”. I studied from it as well. Then came the test. When I left, I felt the same way as I did the previous two times I had written a physics test – so I was pretty worried.

    Buuut, a few weeks later, I’ve gone back to check my mark.

    I got a C. I passed. Its over. No more physics. Done.

    BOOOOOOYEEEEEEEEAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    So I apologise for these last 2 posts being so self centered, but I’m just so relieved 🙂

  • Gnook Logo

    Gnook.org is an awesome place that offers free BSD shells, some web space, and a mail account. It’s headed by an attendee of the Ottawa 2600. Anyways, they are in search of a new logo. I decided to submit the following entry:

  • Tentative Piracy Film Outline

    Introduction
    Quick overview on the purpose and intent of this film. Specification of “Western” piracy over Asian piracy (downloading vs. selling goods in markets).

    Modern vs. Traditional Piracy Definitions
    Will cover the use of the word “piracy” to mean copyright violations, and compare it to the traditional definition of shipboard theft. Will also cover how the modern definition does not hold true to its roots (how physical losses are non-existant).

    The Misinformation of Losses
    Will detail the RIAA, MPAA, CRIA, BSA figures of losses, most of which is attributed to piracy. Will then dismantle these claims, and analyse them one by one. For instance; when the RIAA claims x million dollars in revenue loss, they fail to mention that that only reflects that of the CD media, and that the gains through other medias (DVD, Online) far outsurpass any losses.

    Industry Corruption
    Will cover the corruption in the media industry. How the RIAA payed the senator in charge of American copyrights $180,000. How Sony/BMG bribes radio stations to play their music, as opposed to lesser known bands. How the RIAA artificially inflated prices on CDs.

    The Media Link
    Will cover the role of the media in the piracy issue. Namely the lack of research on part of journalists. Will have actual media footage on the issue; screenshots of newspapers. Will compare examples of same events being covered very differently (read: skewed) by media entities.

    Transformation of IP Law
    Will cover the history of copyright, and its recent changes that drastically alter the very purpose of IP law. For instance: How copyrights no longer benefit the public domain, due to constant extensions of the protection of properties.

    Collateral
    This section will cover the “damages” caused by the media industries in the wake of this war on piracy. Will cover the sideeffects of the DMCA, and the lawsuits that have arisen as such. How the DMCA makes it illegal to watch legally purchased DVDs on a player you own. CSS. Frivolous lawsuits arisen as a consequence of the DMCA and WIPOs stance on TPMs. Will also cover the impact of DRM, and how it inhibits fair use of products.

    Fallout: The Lawsuits
    Will cover the lawsuits by the RIAA on individuals; MPAA on certain domain owners. The dynamics of how no one is able to afford to battle them in court; and the little-published errors on the RIAAs part (individuals sued that did not possess computers). Will also cover the dirtier rulings in this area. Will attempt to gain interviews of those sued.

    The System is Broken
    Will cover why people violate IP laws to begin with. Remixing. Overly-Expensive Software. Ripoff prices. Unavailability (radio monopoly, anime, abandonware). Impossibility to liscence. Many interviews with average street joes for this one.

    The Solutions
    Will cover Magnatune; Creative Commons; other solutions. Will have an interview with the Canadian representative for the CC, and an artist that I consider to be succesful via the CC.

    The Future
    The last section. Will cover recently enacted legislations; legistlations that are in the process of being; government rulings; and opinions from all the interviewees.

    Extra: Views
    In this section, I wish to present the unadulterated views of various individuals on the issue of piracy. Interviews will range from average joes to those in the release groups. This part will not be played along with the other topics; but will rather be positionned to be a DVD extra.

    I will also attempt to have an interview with: Michael Geist (outspoken member on the whole IP issue); representatives for the CRIA; among others. If you can think of anything I should include, please do tell. This outline is by no means final.

    This is not a war on the moralities of piracy. This is a PR war. Whoever has the strongest voice wins. Therefore, I will not look at the Grokster vs. MGM case that deals with morality, so much as the MGM stats that are used in its antipiracy PR campaign.