Every other post.
For web designers dabbing in CSS, an interesting challenge is to make the webpage look the same in all web browsing platforms. The most interesting conundrum of which is dealing with how Internet Explorer deals with displaying CSS; which tends to differ from the norm. Take the following website for instance:
The first screenshot is the page in Firefox. The second is with Internet Explorer. Fun times.
This blog is entitled “My inane life… in glorious details”, and bear with me as I make full use of the “inane” bit.
I am going into my third year of university, as a student of physical geography. Because my program is under the science faculty, my first year consisted of required “threshold science classes”, including Calculus, Chemistry, and Physics. These were all subjects that I faired rather poorly in High School.
My first year of university was no different – I passed both Chemistry classes by the skin of my teeth. I failed Calculus … twice. And despite my passing the first physics course, I failed the second one … twice. Needless to say, my average was the pits. Nevertheless, I succeeded very well in my Geography/Geology courses.
Then came first semester of year 2. If I failed math again, I would be kicked out of the faculty. I passed. With a B. And I passed everyother class with an equally good average [hey B is great for me!]. Physics had to wait for the 2nd semester though, as it was not offered the first time round. Second semester came. I passed the second math class with a B; and all my other grades were just as high. And hey: I even got an A!
All except for Physics. I had failed it a second time. But there was hope: I could take a supplemental exam, as I had garnered an “E” grade as opposed to “F” like the previous times. I dreaded this new exam. I had studied like crazy the month before the initial exam, written 20 pages of notes, bought a solutions manual, did all the problems I could see. But I still failed. So now there was this 2nd exam coming along, and I was worried.
I bought another physics textbook. It was cheap, coming in at under $30 CDN and contained hundreds of problems/solutions. “Schaum’s Outline to Physics for Science and Engineering”. I studied from it as well. Then came the test. When I left, I felt the same way as I did the previous two times I had written a physics test – so I was pretty worried.
Buuut, a few weeks later, I’ve gone back to check my mark.
I got a C. I passed. Its over. No more physics. Done.
BOOOOOOYEEEEEEEEAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So I apologise for these last 2 posts being so self centered, but I’m just so relieved 🙂
It was my birthday on the 23rd of July. Here are some pictures.
Florida Attorney Jack Thompson, the same individual who claims that video games are murder training tools, has now shifted his focus onto EA and The Sims 2.
His allegations however are conflicting. He is blaming the mod community for a pre-existing in-game cheat in this very game that would allow for users to view nude Sims.
Thompson wrote: “The nudity placed there by the publisher/maker, Electronic Arts, is accessed by the use of a simple code that removes what is called ‘the blur’ which obscures the genital areas. In other words, the game was released to the public by the manufacturer knowing that the full frontal nudity was resident on the game and would be accessed by use of a simple code widely provided on the Internet.”
There are three things wrong with his allegations. First off: the mod community is not responsible for cheats that come included with a game. Second of all, that supposed cheat that would allow to see nude sims does not actually exist. Third of all, the texturing for the sims in the game does not include genetellia. That means if that anyone ever did manage to remove the blur, they would still not see any obscene body parts.
Clearly this is an example of just how ignorant Thompson is upon the issue. Unfortunately, the repercussions are dire. Thompson updated his letter, and stated “I urgently ask Electronic Arts to stop this modding activity by appropriate means, otherwise the “T” rating given the game by ESRB means, for all practical purposes, nothing and breaches trust with parents.”
First of all, it is simply ridiculous that a product be judged not on its own merit, but on the merits of what one user could unexpectidly modify that product to do. Anything can be made “obscene” by other individuals: think adding a “strip club” building to SimCity, or having planes with pornographic images painted on them in Flight Simulator 2004. As anything can be made obscene, does that mean that logically all games should be given an “AO” (Adults Only) ESRB rating off the bat? Even if the game is “Math Reader for Grade 1”?
Of course, it does not end there. Think of movies and shows: should we rate all movies “R”, even Bambi, because someone modified the DVD post-production to allow for obscene content to be included? Obviously, in any situation, the developper should not be responsible for the actions of others. It is common sense; something I find lacking in Jack Thompson.
Ultimately, the mod community is a great one. Selflessly giving away free content to users and allowing them to enjoy their video games further. Much of it appeases to all masses; only a small fraction of a fraction is obscene in nature. Furthermore, many mods go on to become full-fledged video games which bring in much revenue (Counter-Strike, Tactical Ops, Desert Combat [to BF2]). Having as a target this selflessly and well balanced community truly displays just how ignorant Jack Thompson is.
Jack Thompson stated in his letter that EA was “cooperating, gleefully, with the mod community to turn Sims 2 into a porn offering.”
There’s been other coverage on Jack Thompson before. GameRadio recently discussed letters that went back and forth between him and a non-anti-videogame advocate. Needless to say, Jack Thompson cares nothing about the games themselves, his accuracy, or creating any substantial argument to fuel his cause.
It will be interesting to see how the ESRB reacts to all of this.
